MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W249567342

Innovation Reinvented: Six Games to Drive Growth

2012· article· en· W249567342 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch-Technology Management · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Strategy and Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMillerDisruptive innovationMarketingBusinessInnovation management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Innovation Reinvented: Six Games to Drive Growth Roger Miller and Marcel Cote (Toronto, Ontario: Rotman- UTP Publishing, 2012) In Innovation Reinvented, Roger Miller and Marcel Cote reinvent the understanding of innovation processes by recognizing that innovation is a fundamental characteristic of, and driven by, maturing business models. Although this idea is in conflict with the classic paradigm of innovation, it is well supported by data gathered in a global survey of innovative businesses, conducted with the support of the Industrial Research Institute (IRI). (1) Analyzing these firms' approaches to innovation, Miller and Cote found that the classic model was of little use in understanding actual innovation patterns. What mattered most were customer interactions, marketing, and change management. These factors drive distinct patterns of innovation, characterized as competitive games. Managing RD the first introduces the six games of innovation, the second gives a detailed description of each of the games, and the third describes how the games may be applied to RD other attributes vary by the kind of innovation: * Autonomous products. These are innovations characterized by new, standalone products, such as a new blockbuster drug, a solar panel, or a Cirque du Soleil performance. These innovations are often science- or technology-based, and brand identity and patents are usually used to fend off emulators. Marketing is critical. * Platforms. In this instance, the innovation is a new system, like Microsoft Office, smart phones, or televisions. Success in this field depends upon vision, network effects, and coalition building. Venture capitalists are often key to funding early work. * Closed systems. Innovations falling into these games are characterized as system breakthroughs. Examples are integrated accounting software or electric car batteries. These industries, which are based on collaboration between an inventor and a demanding client, are characterized by an intense, high-risk development environment. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.012
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it