MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W249567342

Innovation Reinvented: Six Games to Drive Growth

2012· article· en· W249567342 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Germeraad

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch-Technology Management · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Strategy and Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMillerDisruptive innovationMarketingBusinessInnovation management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Innovation Reinvented: Six Games to Drive Growth Roger Miller and Marcel Cote (Toronto, Ontario: Rotman- UTP Publishing, 2012) In Innovation Reinvented, Roger Miller and Marcel Cote reinvent the understanding of innovation processes by recognizing that innovation is a fundamental characteristic of, and driven by, maturing business models. Although this idea is in conflict with the classic paradigm of innovation, it is well supported by data gathered in a global survey of innovative businesses, conducted with the support of the Industrial Research Institute (IRI). (1) Analyzing these firms' approaches to innovation, Miller and Cote found that the classic model was of little use in understanding actual innovation patterns. What mattered most were customer interactions, marketing, and change management. These factors drive distinct patterns of innovation, characterized as competitive games. Managing RD the first introduces the six games of innovation, the second gives a detailed description of each of the games, and the third describes how the games may be applied to RD other attributes vary by the kind of innovation: * Autonomous products. These are innovations characterized by new, standalone products, such as a new blockbuster drug, a solar panel, or a Cirque du Soleil performance. These innovations are often science- or technology-based, and brand identity and patents are usually used to fend off emulators. Marketing is critical. * Platforms. In this instance, the innovation is a new system, like Microsoft Office, smart phones, or televisions. Success in this field depends upon vision, network effects, and coalition building. Venture capitalists are often key to funding early work. * Closed systems. Innovations falling into these games are characterized as system breakthroughs. Examples are integrated accounting software or electric car batteries. These industries, which are based on collaboration between an inventor and a demanding client, are characterized by an intense, high-risk development environment. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.011
Scholarly communication0.0160.018
Open science0.0020.011
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch-Technology ManagementSame topicBusiness Strategy and InnovationFrench-language works237,207