MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2495816228 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39450-3_1

Research On and Activities For Mathematically Gifted Students

2016· book-chapter· en· W2495816228 on OpenAlexaff
Florence Mihaela Singer, Linda Jensen Sheffield, Viktor Freiman, Matthias Brandl

Bibliographic record

VenueICME-13 topical surveys · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
FundersUniversität Hamburg
KeywordsPassionMathematics educationCurriculumPedagogyEmpirical researchPsychologyMathematicsSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this Topical Survey is to give a brief overview of the current state of research on and activities for mathematically gifted students around the world, being of interest to educational researchers, research mathematicians, mathematics teachers, teacher educators, curriculum designers, doctoral students, and other stakeholders. The focal topics include empirical, theoretical and methodological issues related to the following themes: Nature of Mathematical Giftedness; Mathematical Promise in Students of Various Ages; Pedagogy and Programs that contribute to the development of mathematical talent, gifts and passion; and Teacher Education. Current and historical research and suggestions for new research paths are included in each category.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueICME-13 topical surveysSame topicCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsFrench-language works237,207