MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2495827959 · doi:10.2118/2006-130

Advances in Diffusivity Measurement of Solvents in Oil Sands

2006· article· en· W2495827959 on OpenAlexafffund
B. Afsahi, Apostolos Kantzas

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNMR spectroscopy and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgarySchlumberger (Canada)
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsAsphaltSolventMass transferThermal diffusivityOil sandsWork (physics)Porous mediumOil fieldPorosityMaterials sciencePenetration depthMineralogyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryPetroleum engineeringGeologyThermodynamicsOpticsComposite materialChromatographyPhysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This work deals with the prediction of mass transfer of solvents in bitumen in the presence and absence of sand through a unified model that uses magnetic resonance response information. Experiments were performed with pairs of solvents and bitumen in the presence of sand and without sand. Low field NMR was used to acquire spectra of the migrating solvent in bitumen or oil sand as a function of time. The experimental results of this work along with data collected previously on similar systems in our laboratory were fit together in a one dimensional Fickian model. The novelty of the presented approach is not only that the new model matches all the experiments to date, but also that this matching can be done independently and without external input parameters. In previous work matching could only be achieved if the depth of solvent penetration was provided through external measurements. The present model predicts diffusivities of solvents in bitumen in the presence of sand to be in the same order of magnitude and a bit lower than diffusivities of solvent in bulk bitumen. It is anticipated that this method would be of value when estimates of mass transfer in solvent based heavy oil processes are attempted in the field. Introduction In solvent-based recovery processes for heavy oil and bitumen, mass transfer phenomena compete with viscous forces, gravity and capillary forces as the predominant means for oil recovery or trapping. In order to understand the relative merit of such forces one must be able to measure mass transfer at reservoir conditions and potentially verify such measurements in the field. There is considerable literature on the measurement of recovery mechanisms and recovery efficiency through solvent based processes for heavy oil and bitumen. The bulk of the work presented in the recent literature focuses around the VAPEX (Vapor Extraction) process but the fundamental work presented can easily apply to any solvent displacement process. If we were to measure mass transfer phenomena in the field, it appears that a possible logging tool with significant potential is magnetic resonance. Thus our group has embarked in a project whereby magnetic resonance is used for the determination of bitumen (or heavy oil) solvent interactions. As two miscible fluids are in contact, they will slowly diffuse into each other. This molecular transport of one substance relative to another is known as diffusion. With time, the interface between the fluids will appear as a diffused mixed zone grading from one pure fluid to the other. The mechanism of diffusion happens due to the random motion of molecules(1,3). The diffusion flux between solvent and heavy oil can be defined as the flow due to concentration gradient between solvent and heavy oil. The diffusion phenomena take place when there is no mixing in the system and the only driving force is the concentration gradient, unlike dispersion that is caused due to flow of fluids in the porous medium. It was observed that as solvent and heavy oil diffuse into each other, the mobility of hydrogen bearing molecules of both oil and solvent change (4).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score0.852

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian International Petroleum ConferenceSame topicNMR spectroscopy and applicationsFrench-language works237,207