Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In the months after the signing of the Geneva agreement, right- and left-wing ministers in Souvanna's cabinet remained unwilling to support a government of national union. In December 1962, two months after the deadline for the withdrawal of foreign troops had passed, there had still been no ICC investigations of—much less reports on—alleged violations of the Geneva agreement. Government ministers, paralyzed by the rule of unanimous consent, could not agree among themselves over the terms of reference for fact-finding missions. The ICC, unwilling to act unilaterally, waited patiently for the outcome of the RLG deliberations. US officials harshly criticized Indian ICC chairman Avtar Singh for his unnecessary “penchant” for unanimity and Canadian commissioner Paul Bridle for his even-handed approach to his responsibilities. The basic problem with the ICC, in the view of Kennedy and his advisers, was that neither Singh nor Bridle seemed to be able to prevent the Polish commissioner, Marek Thee, “from running circles around them.”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it