MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2496219096 · doi:10.1057/9780230595675_4

Spain and Algeria

2000· book-chapter· en· W2496219096 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard Gillespie

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2000
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHispanic-African Historical Relations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiplomacyContext (archaeology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Political scienceGeographyEconomyMiddle EastMediterranean climateDependency (UML)PoliticsDevelopment economicsEconomicsEngineeringArchaeologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the last quarter of a century, Spain’s relations with Algeria, while just as difficult as those with Morocco, have acquired comparable importance as a foundation of Madrid’s Mediterranean diplomacy. Although more recent, the relationship with Algeria is seen by Spanish diplomats as a ‘key bilateral’, owing both to the intrinsic importance and proximity of the North African country and to Spanish determination to overcome excessive national dependency, in two respects. In the context of expanding interests, Madrid’s aim has been to diversify Spain’s Mediterranean relations so as to make her less crucially reliant on cooperation with Rabat, while in terms of energy requirements, the policy since the 1970s has been to diversify both the variety and sources of imported energy in order to reduce what in the late Franco period was a dangerously high level of dependence on oil from the Middle East.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooksSame topicHispanic-African Historical RelationsFrench-language works237,207