MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2496784399 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42111-7_40

Definition of Luxury Dwellings Features for Regulatory Purposes and for Formation of Market Price

2016· book-chapter· en· W2496784399 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Maria Rosaria Guarini, Anthea Chiovitti

Bibliographic record

VenueLecture notes in computer science · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing Market and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKorean Intellectual Property OfficeFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaÉcole Nationale du Génie de l'Eau et de l'Environnement de StrasbourgUniversitas TelkomSzegedi TudományegyetemUniversitas Teknologi YogyakartaUniversidad Nacional del NordesteUniversidad de Playa AnchaUniversidade do MinhoNanjing University of Information Science and TechnologyUniversidad de ValladolidUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulUniversità della CalabriaNetAppUniversität ZürichUniversidad de OviedoMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversidad de CantabriaLondon South Bank UniversityUniversità degli Studi di SalernoUniversitat de BarcelonaUniwersytet ŁódzkiUniversidade de CoimbraNanjing UniversityUniversiti MalayaAkademie Věd České RepublikyEuropean CommissionPolitechnika PoznańskaEast China Normal UniversityUniversità degli Studi di PerugiaKU LeuvenUniversità degli Studi di CagliariEge ÜniversitesiKunsan National UniversityHannam UniversityWonkwang UniversityDeakin UniversityDelhi Technological UniversityInstituto Politécnico de BragançaCairo UniversityIndian Council of Agricultural ResearchLa Trobe UniversityUniversità di PisaEuskal Herriko UnibertsitateaErciyes ÜniversitesiYonsei UniversityWaseda UniversityUniversity of TwenteUniversitatea din BucureștiSaint Petersburg State UniversityZápadočeská Univerzita v PlzniUniversity of ConnecticutUniversidad de SevillaUniversity of LeedsUniversidade de AveiroMonash UniversityUniversity of CanterburySungkyunkwan UniversityUniversitat de GironaUniversità degli Studi della BasilicataUniversità degli Studi Mediterranea di Reggio CalabriaU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsReal estateResidential real estateSample (material)Point (geometry)Relevance (law)Computer scienceCenter (category theory)Industrial organizationBusinessArchitectural engineeringFinanceEngineeringMathematicsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueLecture notes in computer scienceSame topicHousing Market and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207