MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2496828662 · doi:10.5539/mas.v10n8p152

Investigating the Break and the Structural Changes of Tax in United States

2016· article· en· W2496828662 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alireza Shakibaei, Mohammad Reza Ahmadinejad

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural changeEconomicsBusinessMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Structural alterations has made essential changes in the development of countries' economy, international trading and the expansion of urban centers. Structural changes are defined as an alteration in proportional weight of important parts in the major indices such as the output of governments' expenditure, taxes, etc. Since change in traditional structures of economical factors to new structures is one of the most effective reasons of growth and development in the economy of governments, the attention of governments to influencially important economical factors, and studying the process of changes in important parts of economy such as tax has been considered. So considering the important role of tax in the countries’ economy the investigation of changes in the tax structure is of paramount importance, hence in the present study we have examined the structure changes of the types of taxes in America by using the Bai and Perron sequential procedure for the period 1971-2012. The results show that only the corporate tax has faced with the structural changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied Science→Same topicFiscal Policy and Economic Growth→French-language works237,207→