MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2496836894 · doi:10.29173/alr189

Serious Occupational Health and Safety Incidents in the Oil and Gas Industry: Legal Issues and Recommendations

2010· article· en· W2496836894 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Kelli Grier, E. Jane Snidell

Bibliographic record

VenueAlberta Law Review · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicRisk and Safety Analysis
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory ServicesCanada Auto Workers
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrivilege (computing)Occupational safety and healthBusinessPetroleum industryLawLegal riskEnvironmental healthMedicinePolitical scienceEngineeringFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Written primarily for in-house counsel, this article addresses some of the complex legal issues that arise in response to a serious incident in the oil and gas industry. The authors review the relevant reporting obligations under the Occupational Health and Safety Act and provide an overview of the legal issues relating to the privacy of medical records, drug and alcohol testing, privilege, and legal holds. The authors conclude by offering their recommendations regarding policies that should be in place before an incident occurs, as well as actions that should be taken in the immediate aftermath of any serious incident.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlberta Law ReviewSame topicRisk and Safety AnalysisFrench-language works237,207