Bibliographic record
Abstract
Few states can look back on a continuity of such personified state symbolism as the Lands of the Bohemian Crown, now the Czech Republic: Wenceslas (Vâclav/Wenzel) was looked upon since the eleventh century as protectorin-battle, an eternal ruler, and a symbol of the Bohemian state. 1 The Bohemian prince Wenceslas urged the spreading of the Christian faith in the tenth century and defended his country against invasions by the Bavarians in 922. 2 He became a martyr on 28 September 929 (or 935), when he was slain in a clash with his conspiring brother Boleslav at Starâ Boleslav (Altbunzlau). In the background of this bloody conflict apparently stood both the forced conversion to Christianity and Wenceslas’s readiness to submit to the rule of the Saxon kings in 929, paying a tribute of 500 pounds in silver and 120 oxen. It is the fratricidal Boleslav, who successfully ruled the country for over 30 years, who went down in history as the real founder of the state. Historically, Wenceslas can only boast of having converted to Christianity nothing more than his small territory, and of a limited knowledge of Latin. But ever since the tenth century, he has been venerated as a martyr and, as early as the tenth and eleventh centuries, he has been revered as a most powerful ruler. His vita was first written in the tenth century both in Old Church Slavonic and Latin (commissioned by Emperor Otto II). Although there is little historical evidence to support this joined Slav and German tradition of worship, Wenceslas’s cult continued unbroken until after 1945. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".