MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2496990807 · doi:10.34096/cas.i42.2299

Ciudadanía indígena: luchas históricas por la igualdad y la diferencia colonial en Bolivia

2015· article· es· W2496990807 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFILO - Digital (University of Buenos Aires) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCritical Theory and Political Philosophy
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitizenshipIndigenousColonialismPoliticsTransformative learningPresuppositionModernitySociologyGender studiesPolitical scienceHumanitiesLawEpistemologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"Este artículo argumenta que, históricamente, los pueblos indígenas de Bolivia han sido conscientes de los límites que entraña el concepto de “ciudadanía” y la política moderna como herramientas para luchar contra la exclusión de sus formas de vida. Sin embargo, y a pesar de ello, no han descartado completamente el concepto de “ciudadanía” sino que lo han transformado de maneras novedosas para defender sus proyectos de existen-cia. Dos conceptos claves guían esta reflexión: el primero es el concepto de “igualdad” inspirado en Jacques Rancière y el segundo es el concepto de “diferencia colonial”. El artículo sugiere que el concepto de “ciudadanía indígena” es una forma de aprehender y analizar el potencial transformador que tiene el combinar indigeneidad y ciudadanía."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it