MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2497014538 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511921179.013

Preoptic and basal forebrain modulation of REM sleep

2011· book-chapter· en· W2497014538 on OpenAlexaff
Kazue Semba

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasal forebrainNeuroscience of sleepPreoptic areaNeuroscienceSuprachiasmatic nucleusForebrainHypothalamusSleep onsetSleep (system call)WakefulnessPsychologyBiologyCentral nervous systemElectroencephalographyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the basic mechanisms of REM sleep regulation are thought to reside in the brain stem, considerable evidence suggests that the forebrain, including the preoptic area and the adjacent basal forebrain (BF) as well as the hypothalamus, participates in the regulation of REM sleep. In this review we will first discuss findings that support the role of the preoptic area (POA) in REM sleep, with special focus on the ventrolateral preoptic nucleus (VLPO) and the median preoptic nucleus (MnPO). We will then review evidence for a role of the BF in REM sleep regulation and briefly discuss the role of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) in the circadian pattern of REM sleep. We will conclude with a view that the POA and BF house a continuum of distinct sleep–wake regulatory neurons with descending and ascending projections that interact with neurons in the posterior hypothalamus, brain stem, and cortex to regulate sleep and wakefulness, including REM sleep. Since early transection studies, basic neural mechanisms responsible for the occurrence of REM sleep have been thought to reside in the pons, wherein the cyclic occurrence of REM sleep has been postulated to be controlled through the interaction between neurons that execute (REM-on) and those that block (REM-off) REM sleep. The ideas about the identity of these neurons have gone through several revisions. The current reciprocal interaction model focuses on cholinergic REM-on and monoaminergic REM-off neurons (Pace-Schott and Hobson, 2002), whereas the flip-flop model (Lu et al ., 2006) and a similar model (Sapin et al ., 2009) emphasize GABAergic/glutamatergic REM-on neurons in the sublaterodorsal nucleus and GABAergic REM-off neurons in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray. Despite this focus on the brain stem for executive mechanisms of REM sleep, there is considerable evidence to suggest that the forebrain, in particular the hypothalamus as well as the POA and the adjacent BF, participates in REM sleep regulation. This review will focus on the role of the POA, including the VLPO and MnPO, and the BF in REM sleep regulation. The role of the SCN of the hypothalamus in the circadian pattern of REM sleep is also discussed briefly. According to the common usage, the BF here refers to those ventral forebrain regions that contain magnocellular cholinergic neurons (Semba, 2000).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207