MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2497026976 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-3106

Abstract 3106: Elucidating molecular mechanisms linking microRNA-206 loss to tumor progression and metastasis

2015· article· en· W2497026976 on OpenAlexaff
Kathleen Watt, Peter Truesdell, Andrew W. Craig

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvadopodiaMetastasisCancer researchCancermicroRNABreast cancerCancer cellIntravasationOncomirBiologyMedicinePathologyCarcinogenesisInternal medicineGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Metastasis is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths, and this occurs when tumor cells invade basement membranes and blood vessels to colonize other tissues. Metastasis is facilitated by extracellular matrix (ECM)-degrading structures called invadopodia. Recently, several microRNAs (miRNAs) have been identified as tumor and metastasis suppressor genes. Loss of expression of miR-206 has been correlated with poor prognosis in gastric cancer, breast cancer, rhabdomyosarcoma and melanoma. A previous study by others has demonstrated that restoring miR-206 expression in human breast cancer cells was sufficient to block metastasis in tumor xenograft assays. However, the targets of miR-206 that cause metastasis in these cancer models have not been fully characterized. Here, we have tested the effects of miR-206 on invadopodia in metastatic cancer cells, and identified a novel target that may explain this effect. Transducer of Cdc42-mediated Actin assembly-1 (Toca-1) is an adaptor protein that promotes formation of invadopodia and metastasis in breast cancer models, and has a predicted miR-206 binding site within the 3′ UTR of Toca-1 transcripts. To test whether the high levels of Toca-1 expression that we have observed in metastatic cancer cell lines was due to loss of miR-206, we rescued miR-206 expression using transient, stable or inducible approaches in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer, A375 melanoma, and H1299 lung cancer cell lines. In each cell model, Toca-1 expression was reduced upon miR-206 expression at both the mRNA and protein levels, thus validating Toca-1 as a new target of miR-206. Further testing of the phenotypes induced by miR-206 rescue revealed dramatic defects in ECM degradation and cell invasion in breast cancer and melanoma cell models. In subcutaneous tumor xenograft assays, stable rescue of miR-206 in H1299 tumors led to defects in tumor growth compared to those expressing a scrambled control miRNA. In addition, miR-206 expression caused a dramatic reduction in the numbers of lung metastases. We are currently extending this to our melanoma models and inducible models to define changes in metastasis-related targets of miR-206 that are aberrantly expressed in metastatic cancers. In conclusion, our study demonstrates for the first time a link between miR-206 and suppression of invadopodia formation via Toca-1 silencing, which likely contributes to the metastasis suppressing activity of miR-206 in multiple cancer types. Citation Format: Kathleen D. Watt, Peter Truesdell, Andrew W. Craig. Elucidating molecular mechanisms linking microRNA-206 loss to tumor progression and metastasis. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 3106. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-3106

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineFrench-language works237,207