MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

La gestion intégrée des matières résiduelles : revue des outils favorisant l'écologie industrielle

2007· article· en· W2497521845 on OpenAlexaff
Gabriel Rojo

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironnement Ingénierie & Développement · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSustainable Industrial Ecology
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Considering the necessity to establish principles of sustainable development within our industrialized society, and faced with growing volumes of industrial waste, it became essential to set up mechanisms to support the management of these residues (Thomas et al., 2005). Throughout the last three decades, many tools have been elaborated to assist decision making. However, some deficiencies were exposed after employing these tools because of the impossibility to execute, in a simple and effective way, comparisons and simulations of scenarios in order to analyse the behaviour of management systems (Harrison et al., 2001). Generally, the examination of environmental impacts and costs are the main functions imputed to current tools. Furthermore, the systemic behaviour stem from the decisions taken is totally ignored (Wang et al., 1996). Consequently, new tools need to be developed in order to offer more sustainable solutions to assist waste management. Devant la nécessité d'instaurer les principes du développement durable dans nos sociétés industrialisées, et face aux volumes grandissants de résidus industriels générés, il s'avère essentiel de mettre en place des mécanismes pour soutenir la gestion de ces matières résiduelles (Thomas et al., 2005). Au cours des trois dernières décennies, plusieurs outils ont été développés pour appuyer la prise de décisions lors de cette gestion. Toutefois, des lacunes ont été relevées suite à l'application de ces outils, en raison de l'impossibilité d'effectuer, de façon simple et efficace, des comparaisons ou des simulations de scénarios dans le but d'analyser le comportement des systèmes de gestion (Harrison et al., 2001). L'analyse des impacts environnementaux et celle des coûts sont les principales fonctions des outils actuellement disponibles, et le comportement systémique découlant des décisions prises est ignoré (Wang et al., 1996). En ce sens, de nouveaux outils devront être élaborés afin de proposer des solutions plus durables pour la gestion des matières résiduelles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.008
Scholarly communication0.0130.011
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironnement Ingénierie & DéveloppementSame topicSustainable Industrial EcologyFrench-language works237,207