MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modular Implementation of an Ontology-Driven Multimedia Content Delivery Application for Mobile Networks

2008· book-chapter· en· W2497525557 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert Zehetmayer, Wolfgang Klas, Ross King

Bibliographic record

VenueIGI Global eBooks · 2008
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultimedia Communication and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMultimediaModular designMiddleware (distributed applications)World Wide WebOntologyService (business)Event (particle physics)IP Multimedia SubsystemComputer networkQuality of serviceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today, mobile multimedia applications provide customers with only limited means to define what information they wish to receive. However, customers would prefer to receive content that reflects specific personal interests. In this chapter we present a prototype multimedia application that demonstrates personalised content delivery using the multimedia messaging service (MMS) protocol. The development of the application was based on the multimedia middleware framework METIS, which can be easily tailored to specific application needs. The principle application logic was constructed through three indepdent modules, or “plug-ins” that make use of METIS and its underlying event system: the harverster module, which automatically collects multimedia content from configured RSS feeds, the news module, which builds custom content based on user preferences, and the MMS module, which is reponsible for broadcasting the resulting multimedia messages. Our experience with the implementation demonstrated the rapid and modular development made possible by such a flexible middleware framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIGI Global eBooksSame topicMultimedia Communication and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207