MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2497604330 · doi:10.1111/avsc.12246

Effects of competition, shade and soil conditions on the recolonization of three forest herbs in tree‐planted riparian zones

2016· article· en· W2497604330 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Vegetation Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsUnderstoryRiparian zoneRiparian forestCompetition (biology)AgroforestryEnvironmental scienceHabitatBiologyEcologyForestryAgronomyGeographyCanopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Questions In mesic forests, ecological filters due to past agricultural land use reduce forest herb recolonization. Is the recruitment of such species also limited in tree‐planted riparian zones by local filters such as competition, shade level and soil conditions? Location Two agricultural watersheds, southeastern Québec, Canada. Methods Three herbs characteristic of natural riparian forests were selected for this study: one graminoid, Glyceria striata , and two ferns, Matteuccia struthiopteris and Onoclea sensibilis . Effects of shade level (75% vs 50%) and soil type (forest vs agricultural soil) on seedling emergence were evaluated in a seed‐sowing greenhouse experiment. In a 2‐yr transplant field experiment, seedling and sporophyte establishment was monitored in five natural riparian forests and five tree‐planted post‐agricultural riparian zones on microsites with understorey vegetation kept intact or cleared and on forest or agricultural soils. Using a priori contrasts, we assessed the influence of habitat type (natural riparian forests or tree‐planted riparian zones), competition and post‐agricultural soil type on transplant survival and growth. Results Seedling emergence tended to be higher on forest soils for G . striata while sporophyte emergence increased under 75% shade for M . struthiopteris . Transplanted seedlings and sporophytes of the three species survived and grew as well in tree‐planted riparian zones as in natural riparian forests. In tree‐planted riparian zones however, competing understorey vegetation reduced the survival and growth of G . striata and agricultural soil reduced the growth of M . struthiopteris . For O . sensibilis , only sporophyte survival was reduced by competition in tree‐planted riparian zones. Conclusions Planting trees in post‐agricultural riparian zones fosters establishment of forest herbs similar than those observed in natural riparian forests. Additional environmental filters specific to tree‐planted riparian zones, however, offset the positive influence of trees and limit recolonization of the three studied species. Considering the partial restoration success of establishment niches by tree planting, controlling spontaneous vegetation after tree planting is advised when conceivable and cost‐effective to promote the recolonization of environmentally‐limited forest herbs. Long‐term transplant experiments should be more often conducted to identify the ecological filters that reduce plant recolonization, and thereby design the most effective restoration strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.610
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it