Correlation Between Substrate Morphology and the Initial Stages of Epitaxial Organic Growth: PTCDA/Ag(111)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide We have investigated the initial growth of the first two epitaxial layers of PTCDA on a Ag(111) surface consisting of a distribution of flat (111) terraces, separated by single atomic steps or step bunches with a few point defects. By utilizing the low-energy electron microscopy (LEEM) technique in both bright and dark field modes, we are able not only to follow the growth of the first layers but also to distinguish between different rotational and mirror domains and their influence on the growth of subsequent layers. Thus, we learn much about diffusion lengths and barriers, domain sizes, and about the influence of domain boundaries and nucleation centers. The results give deep insight into the growth dynamics, the influence of step orientation, and the quality of the resulting epitaxial layers and lead to the conclusion that the morphology of the substrate surface is likely to be the most influential parameter for the homogeneity of epitaxial layers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it