Improved QM/MM Linear-Interaction Energy Model for Substrate Recognition in Zinc-Containing Metalloenzymes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the essential challenges in the description of receptor-drug interactions in the presence of various polyvalent cations (such as zinc, magnesium, or iron) is the accurate assessment of the electronic effects due to cofactor binding. The effects can range from partial electronic polarization of the proximal atoms in a receptor and bound substrate to long-range effects related to partial charge transfer and electronic delocalization effects between the cofactor and the drug. Here, we examine the role of the explicit account for electronic effects for a panel of small-molecule inhibitors binding to the zinc-aminopeptidase PfA-M1, an essential target for antimalarial drug development. Our study on PfA-M1:inhibitor interactions at the QM level reveals that the partial charge and proton transfer due to bound zinc ion are important mechanisms in the inhibitors' recognition and catalysis. The combination of classical MD simulations with a posteriori QM/MM corrections with novel DFTB parameters for the zinc cation and the linear-interaction energy (LIE) approach offers by far the most accurate estimates for the PfA-M1:inhibitor binding affinities, opening the door for future inhibitor design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".