MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2497872007 · doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-370-4_1

Reviewing the Literature

2015· book-chapter· en· W2497872007 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kenneth D. Gariepy

Bibliographic record

VenueSensePublishers eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAcademic Freedom and Politics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of the Fraser Valley
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcademic freedomAutonomyCorporate governanceFrench hornPolitical scienceLibrary scienceSociologyMedia studiesHigher educationLawManagementPedagogyComputer scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As Cameron (1996) observes, the academic freedom literature is an “enormous repository of evidence and opinion” (p. 1). For example, the two selective bibliographies that deeply inform this review, Horn’s (2002) Academic Freedom, Academic Tenure, University Autonomy, and University Governance in Canada: A Bibliography , and Aby and Kuhn’s (2000) Academic Freedom: A Guide to the Literature contain approximately 565 and 500 citations respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score0.969

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensePublishers eBooksSame topicAcademic Freedom and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207