MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2498033477 · doi:10.1109/biorob.2016.7523816

Optimizing the Maximum Torque of bioinspired climbing robots in static equilibrium

2016· article· en· W2498033477 on OpenAlexaff
Ausama Ahmed, Carlo Menon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Locomotion and Control
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobotClimbLinear programmingTorqueDifferentiable functionGenetic algorithmMathematical optimizationComputer scienceGenetic programmingControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inspired by insects and lizards, many biomimetic robots have been proposed in the literature to climb vertical surfaces. A common problem of these robots is minimizing the maximum torque at their joints to safely adhere to a vertical wall. This problem is non-linear and non-differentiable in nature, which requires the use of non-linear optimizers to find a solution. In this paper we propose to transform such a non-linear problem in a linear one using linear programming. We provide evidence that the proposed approach is efficient and fast when the non-linear problem is solved using other well-established methods, including Nelder-Mead, Pattern Search algorithm and Genetic Algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Locomotion and ControlFrench-language works237,207