MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2498063915 · doi:10.1057/9780230626331_5

Lao PDR: Hastening Slowly?

2006· book-chapter· en· W2498063915 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
K. J. Joseph

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2006
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSoutheast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureTertiary sector of the economyPrimary sector of the economyQuarter (Canadian coin)ProductivityInvestment (military)PopulationBusinessSecondary sector of the economyEconomic sectorAgricultural economicsEconomicsGeographyDevelopment economicsEconomyEconomic growthPolitical scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Notwithstanding, more than a decade of concerted efforts towards liberalizing the economy and attracting investment towards the productive sectors of the economy and resulting annual growth rate of over 5 per cent Lao PDR, even today, exhibits symptoms of an underdeveloped economy. Over 80 per cent of its population lives in rural areas depending on agriculture and allied activities. Yet, they contribute only about 50 per cent of the GDP pointing towards low levels of productivity in the primary sector. The industrial sector, which contributes about 23 per cent of the GDP, essentially, comprises primary processing and is characterized by high regional concentration. In 2001, Vientiane Municipality and Vientiane Province together accounted for 55 per cent of the large, 41 per cent of the medium and 19 per cent of the small industrial units1 and over 41 per cent of the industrial employment in the country. The service sector, which contributed almost a quarter of the GDP in 2001, was found dominated by wholesale and retail trade. This however, does not imply that there has not been any structural change in the economy. The observed change during the last decade mainly was in terms of a decline in the share of agriculture from about 61 per cent in 1990, 2 the initial year for which data is available, to a little over 51 per cent in 2002. Correspondingly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooksSame topicSoutheast Asian Sociopolitical StudiesFrench-language works237,207