MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2498112369 · doi:10.1109/acc.2016.7525325

Fuzzy Gain Scheduling of Subspace Predictive Controller

2016· article· en· W2498112369 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspace topologyComputer scienceModel predictive controlFuzzy logicScheduling (production processes)Gain schedulingFuzzy control systemControl theory (sociology)Data miningMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a Fuzzy Gain Scheduling (FGS) method to update Subspace Predictive Controller (SPC) gains in the presence of constraints. The method is denoted by FGS-SPC. Unlike existing approaches, FGS-SPC does not to adapt the system model by updating the subspace predictor matrices, instead it re-tunes existing control parameters solely based on future tracking error, its derivatives and derivatives of past control signal. The SPC gains are updated by applying fuzzy logic rules. The advantage of the approach is in not requiring any persistent excitations for updating the system model. Consequently, FGS-SPC has a faster convergence capability and better time efficiency compared to the conventional SPC approaches. Simulation results illustrate the efficiency of proposed method in presence of noisy data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.241

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207