Experimental demonstration of high‐concentration photovoltaics on a parabolic trough using tracking secondary optics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A new approach to high‐concentration photovoltaics (HCPV) based on a parabolic trough primary concentrator is presented. The design diverges from the standard HCPV arrangement of a two‐axis tracking point‐focus concentrator, and rather employs a simpler parabolic trough primary concentrator to reduce cost. To break the 2D limit of concentration, and bring the system into the realm of HCPV, the system employs an array of rotating secondary concentrators is arranged along the focal line of the parabolic trough. The resulting line‐to‐point (LTP) focus geometry allows the system to achieve a geometric concentration of 590×, yet still maintains the advantages of having a linear trough primary concentrator, namely manufacturability, economy, and scalability. A full‐scale prototype of the system was constructed in Biasca, Switzerland. During on‐sun tests a flux concentration of 364 suns was measured at the exit of the secondary concentrator, the highest reported concentration for any parabolic‐trough‐based system. Moreover, the system reached a peak efficiency of 20.2%, the highest measured solar‐to‐DC efficiency for a parabolic trough‐based solar collector. Long‐term performance is estimated by means of a coupled optical‐electrical model validated vis‐à‐vis the experimental results. This work serves as an experimental proof‐of‐concept for high‐concentration trough‐based collectors, thereby opening new avenues for reducing the cost of HCPV systems. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".