MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2498816315 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511997433.026

Dizziness in someone with HIV

2011· book-chapter· en· W2498816315 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas Davies, Bruce J. Brew

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrontotemporal dementiaCorticobasal degenerationProgressive supranuclear palsyApraxiaDystoniaMyoclonusPsychologyFrontotemporal lobar degenerationAphasiaDementiaMedicineParkinsonismNeurosciencePick's diseaseSemantic dementiaDiseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter talks about a 62-year-old right-handed lady who consulted her family doctor when she noticed that she was unable to use her knitting needle properly with her left hand. The provisional diagnosis was Corticobasal Syndrome (CBS) based on the combination of subtle asymmetric extrapyramidal findings and prominent apraxia. CBS is an akinetic-rigid clinical syndrome characterized by lateralized motor and cognitive signs, such as rigidity, dystonia, spontaneous or stimulus-sensitive myoclonus, apraxia, alien limb phenomenon, cortical sensory loss, and aphasia. This clinical syndrome has been associated with many pathological entities other than CBD, including Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP), Alzheimer's disease, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, and many diseases in the spectrum of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD): Pick's disease, Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) with ubiquitin-positive inclusions, FTD due to mutations of MAPT and PGRN. Ante-mortem diagnosis can be difficult because proposed criteria lack sensitivity and specificity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooks→Same topicHIV Research and Treatment→French-language works237,207→