MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2499088747 · doi:10.1177/026248930502400601

Effect of Weld Lines on the Injection Moulding of Structural Foams. I. Foam Morphology

2005· article· en· W2499088747 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCellular Polymers · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Foaming and Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceWeld lineComposite materialMorphology (biology)WeldingHigh-density polyethyleneMoldBlowing agentCell sizeInjection mouldingPolyethylenePolyurethane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of weld lines on the morphology of injection moulded structural polymer foams was studied. In this first part, the effect of processing conditions on density and morphology of high density polyethylene foams is reported. In particular, the effect of density reduction and injection speed was investigated. The results indicate that for lower density foams, skin thickness decreases substantially along flow path and cells collapse is present. At the weld line, local reduction of skin thickness and cell size is related to the formation of a V-notch prior the final expansion and to higher pressures generated by the difficulty to expulse the entrapped air inside the mold. As of the effect of injection speed, cell size and skin thickness differences between samples with or without weld lines were observed and explained by time and gravity effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it