MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2499238098 · doi:10.1109/icc.2016.7511185

Joint MSE-based hybrid precoder and equalizer design for full-duplex massive MIMO systems

2016· article· en· W2499238098 on OpenAlexaff
Ruikai Mai, Duy H. N. Nguyen, Tho Le‐Ngoc

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFull-Duplex Wireless Communications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasebandPrecodingMIMOComputer scienceTelecommunications linkElectronic engineeringDuplex (building)Base stationJoint (building)Channel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsEngineeringBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study joint design of linear hybrid precoding and equalization for full-duplex (FD) massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems such that the sum mean squared error is minimized across all mobile stations. To better resolve practical issues such as hardware complexity, power consumption, and overhead of channel estimation, hybrid processing, which consists of digital processing in the baseband and radio frequency (RF) analog processing, is employed at the base station for simultaneous transmission and reception. In particular, baseband processing is adjusted according to instantaneous channel variation while RF processing is only updated based on such long-term channel statistics as transmit and receive correlation. In the presence of self-interference (SI) and co-channel interference, joint power optimization is carried out in order to achieve balanced performance for both the uplink and the downlink. As demonstrated by numerical results, FD is able to outperform half-duplex under realistic SI. Furthermore, the employment of the proposed hybrid processing structure is justified by its near optimal performance when equipped with even only a small number of RF chains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFull-Duplex Wireless CommunicationsFrench-language works237,207