MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2499279766 · doi:10.1021/bk-2010-1043.ch030

Synthesis of Grafted Polylactic Acid and Polyhydroxyalkanoate by a Green Reactive Extrusion Process

2010· book-chapter· en· W2499279766 on OpenAlexaff
James H. Wang, David M. Schertz

Bibliographic record

VenueACS symposium series · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsKimberly-Clark (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReactive extrusionPolyhydroxyalkanoatesPolylactic acidGraftingMaterials sciencePolymerExtrusionPolymer chemistryPolyethylene glycolPolyvinyl alcoholPEG ratioChemical engineeringChemistryOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grafted polylactic acid (PLA) and polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) were synthesized by a reactive extrusion method. The grafted bio-based polymers had either polar functional groups such as hydroxyl (-OH) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) or non-polar functional groups. It was found that grafted biopolymers had significantly reduced melt viscosity, making them more suitable for certain polymer processing such injection molding and fiber spinning. The grafted biopolymers had improved compatibility in blending with other polar polymers such as polyvinyl alcohol and exhibited improved fiber spinning processability in polymer blends. Grafted PHA had a low crystallization rate making continuous reactive extrusion impossible. It was found that a novel co-grafting method, i.e. grafting PHA in the presence of PLA, was effective to overcome the process challenge of PHA. The reactive groups introduced to PLA or PHA can be used for further side chain reactions. The free radical initiated grafting reaction was a green reaction method. It eliminated the use and recovery of organic solvents, the reaction rate was also significantly increased over solution grafting reaction, taking seconds to complete rather than hours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS symposium seriesSame topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207