MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract LB-180: The genetic landscape of Wilms tumor

2016· article· en· W2499515594 on OpenAlexaff
Samantha Gadd, Amy L. Walz, Ariadne H.A.G. Ooms, Vicki Huff, Daniela S. Gerhard, Malcolm A. Smith, Jaime M. Guidry Auvil, Leandro C. Hermida, Tanja M. Davidsen, Patee Gesuwan, Daoud Meerzaman, Yussanne Ma, Marco A. Marra, Jeffrey S. Dome, Charles G. Mullighan, David A. Wheeler, Oliver Hampton, Julie M. Gastier‐Foster, Nicole Ross, Elizabeth J. Perlman

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnaplasiaWilms' tumorExome sequencingExomeCancerOncologyMedicineCopy-number variationGeneGenomeBiologyGeneticsInternal medicineMutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: The National Cancer Institute's Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET) initiative seeks to characterize the genomes of high-risk pediatric tumors to identify therapeutic targets. The High-Risk Renal Tumor TARGET initiative includes the analysis of pre-therapy favorable histology Wilms Tumors (FHWT) that relapsed and tumors with diffuse anaplasia (unfavorable histology; DAWT). These two tumor subsets have survival rates of approximately 50% and 60%, respectively. Experimental procedures: Genomic sequencing (whole genome [WGS] or exome [WXS]), global copy number analysis, and global gene expression analysis were performed on a discovery set of 117 (78 FHWT, 39 DAWT) pre-therapy high-risk WTs treated on National Wilms Tumor Study-5 (NWTS-5). To determine the frequency of recurrent variants, targeted sequencing (Illumina HiSeq2500) was performed on a validation set of pre-therapy tumor DNA from a case-cohort of all FHWT treated on NWTS-5 (531 FHWT) and all available 118 DAWT treated on NWTS-5 (these groups include tumors from the discovery set). Results: WGS and WXS revealed an average of 21.74 ± 22.6 high-quality variants per DAWT (range, 3-131) and 13.8 ± 10.9 per FHWT (range 2-58). Genes previously reported to be recurrently mutated in WT were mutated at the following frequencies in the validation set: WTX (6%), CTNNB1 (15%), WT1 (7.5%), DROSHA (11%), DGCR8 (4.5%), XPO5 (2%), SIX1/2 (7%), and MLLT1 (3%). In addition, mutations were identified in three genes that impact the NMYC pathway, which is known to be involved in renal development. These include MYCN P44L/H (4%), MAX R60Q (2%), and novel mutations in NONO (2%); these mutations were mutually exclusive. Novel mutations in BCOR, a transcriptional corepressor that regulates both gene expression during development and chromatin modification, were found in 3% of validation set tumors. Analysis of global gene expression revealed significant up-regulation of genes associated with kidney development, extracellular matrix organization, and epithelial tube development in BCOR-mutant tumors compared with precursor lesions (5 hyperplastic perilobar nephrogenic rests). TP53 mutations were identified in 48% of DAWTs and 1% of FHWTs. The above data do not include copy number changes, which were recurrently detected in WT1, WTX, NMYC, and TP53. Conclusions: Through the TARGET initiative, we have identified several novel, potential driver mutations that occur in WT and have not been reported in other pediatric tumors. The majority of these genes are known to function in processes critical to early development and/or specifically in renal development. Many of these mutations are accompanied by Wnt activating mutations or 11p15 biallelic expression. However, approximately 50% of WTs lack clear driver mutations. Future studies will need to focus on elucidating epigenetic alterations in these tumors as well as genetic changes outside of protein-coding regions. Citation Format: Samantha L. Gadd, Amy L. Walz, Ariadne HAG Ooms, Vicki Huff, Daniela S. Gerhard, Malcolm A. Smith, Jaime M. Guidry Auvil, Leandro Hermida, Tanja Davidsen, Patee Gesuwan, Daoud Meerzaman, Yussanne Ma, Marco A. Marra, Jeffrey S. Dome, Charles G. Mullighan, David A. Wheeler, Oliver A. Hampton, Julie M. Gastier-Foster, Nicole Ross, Elizabeth J. Perlman. The genetic landscape of Wilms tumor. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-180.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicRenal and related cancersFrench-language works237,207