MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2499640484 · doi:10.2514/1.j055013

Real-Time Regional Jet Comprehensive Aeroicing Analysis via Reduced-Order Modeling

2016· article· en· W2499640484 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIcingFlight envelopeAerodynamicsAirplaneComputer scienceContext (archaeology)Aerospace engineeringInterpolation (computer graphics)CertificationEnvelope (radar)Aircraft flight mechanicsSimulationEngineeringMeteorologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a reduced-order modeling framework based on proper orthogonal decomposition, multidimensional interpolation, and machine learning algorithms, along with an error-driven iterative sampling method, to adaptively select an optimal set of snapshots in the context of in-flight icing certification. The methodology is applied, to the best of our knowledge for the first time, to a complete aircraft and to the entire icing certification envelope, providing invaluable additional data to those from icing tunnels or natural flight testing. This systematic methodology is applied to the shape/mass of ice and to the aerodynamics penalties in terms of lift, drag, and pitching moments. The level of accuracy achieved strongly supports the drive to incorporate more computational fluid dynamics information into in-flight icing certification and pilot training programs, leading to increased aviation safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it