MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2499741707 · doi:10.1109/icc.2016.7511419

A novel R-PCA based multivariate fault-tolerant data aggregation algorithm in WSNs

2016· article· en· W2499741707 on OpenAlexaff
Tianqi Yu, Xianbin Wang, Abdallah Shami

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultivariate statisticsComputer scienceFault toleranceAlgorithmData aggregatorWireless sensor networkData miningComputer networkDistributed computingMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless sensor networks have already been pervasively utilized due to the rapid deployment of information and communication technology (ICT) in many industrial applications, which generate massive amount of sensor data. This development has brought several technical challenges in sensor data processing, e.g., data fault and data redundancy. Principal component analysis (PCA) has been used recently to process the massive but correlated sensor data. However, the conventional PCA method is difficult to be adapted in following the dynamic conditions of wireless sensor networks. In this paper, recursive principal component analysis (R-PCA) method is exploited to progressively update the transformation basis for extracting principal components. Furthermore, a novel R-PCA based algorithm is proposed to address data fault and data redundancy problems. Different from conventional PCA-based algorithms, the proposed algorithm is cluster-based so that the network efficiency can be further improved. Simulations based on a practical dataset have been conducted to evaluate the performance of algorithms. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm improves the fault detection accuracy by about 20% and reduces the data restoration error by about 28%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207