MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2499905534 · doi:10.1093/fs/knw172

<i>Sapphic Fathers: Discourses of Same-Sex Desire from Nineteenth-Century France</i> . By G <scp>retchen</scp> S <scp>chultz</scp> . <i>Sapphic Fathers: Discourses of Same-Sex Desire from Nineteenth-Century France</i> . By SchultzGretchen. (University of Toronto Romance Series.) Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015. 295 pp., ill.

2016· article· en· W2499905534 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David A. Powell

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLesbianPoetryLiteraturePoliticsArtHistoryPornographyGender studiesSociologyPsychoanalysisPsychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gretchen Schultz delivers a first-rate exploration of French lesbian literature from the mid-nineteenth century through the turn of the century and its influence on mid-twentieth-century American lesbian pulp fiction. Schultz seeks to examine ‘what stake French male writers have in female homoeroticism, and what kind of heritage these sapphic fathers bequeath to subsequent generations’ (p. 4). Not only a skilful investigation and analysis of male-authored literature with lesbian content, the book is also well written: coherent and cogent, precise and witty. A comprehensive historical, political, and sociological contextualization of representations of homosexuality and lesbianism begins the study, followed by a sophisticated version of the requisite terminology section. Schultz lucidly analyses the far-reaching effects of the poetic tribade depictions of Baudelaire and Verlaine. Her exquisitely thorough and sensitive reading of these ‘lesbian poems’ will be appreciated by scholars already familiar with them, and shows ‘it is predominately the poetry of the period that offers the most striking examples’ (p. 29) of nineteenth-century French male authors’ identification with lesbians. Notwithstanding the clearly masculine subjectification inherent in these and most of the texts written by ‘sapphic fathers’, Schultz consistently avoids essentializing and frequently engages the criticism of the voyeuristic construct. After a close reading of Mademoiselle Giraud, ma femme (1870), she examines Adolphe Belot’s place in the ‘rise of the sapphic novel’ (p. 66) with an in-depth analysis of the less familiar Mélinite (1878). This chapter looks at how romans populaires and pornography contribute to Belot’s and others’ marketplace success. Schultz notes that Belot’s erotic novels ‘condemn [the] hypocrisy’ (p. 103) of the sexual double standard apparent in his popular novels, despite ‘[t]he disjunction between female narratee and implied male reader enabl[ing] male voyeurism of female homosexuality’ (ibid.). Schultz next tackles the question of social class. Comparing the aristocratic lesbian and the sex-worker-turned-lesbian characters in Zola’s Nana (1880), Catulle Mendès’s Mephistophéla (1890), and Joséphin Péladan’s La Gynandre (1891), Schultz reveals the anti-Republican and socialist sentiments these texts present, casting prejudice of class and ethnicity as a significant cause of the degeneration of Third Republic society and nation. Chapter 4 delivers a comprehensive summary of French, British, and European ‘scientific’ discourse on homosexuality. Schultz identifies how these texts depict ‘tribadism’ in terms of hygiene, class, heredity, and masturbation. Her cogent analysis demonstrates how scientists, jurists, and novelists came to perceive and define lesbians as symbols of criminality, prostitution, pathology, degeneracy, and the decline of family and society. Finally Schultz explores the influence of French novelists on mid-twentieth-century American pulp novels. Schultz shows how the Paris–Lesbos context enhanced readers’ attraction to train-station lesbian narratives. Moreover she explains how the cross-Atlantic association challenged the perceived connection McCarthyist politics drew between lesbians and Communism. Schultz’s book will undoubtedly be required reading for scholars of queer studies and students of nineteenth-century French literature. The lengthy overview of naturalism makes the book accessible to a wider audience. The book is a treasure chest of insight, information, and inspiration for researchers interested in, or curious about, representations of lesbians in (nineteenth-century French) literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0130.009
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesFrench-language works237,207