Articulaciones de edad y género en la construcción de feminidades en un programa de prevención del delito juvenil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo analiza el interjuego existente entre las dimensionesde género y edad en la construcción de beneficiarias en un programade prevención del delito juvenil implementado en Buenos Aires. Elargumento se inscribe dentro de las discusiones que sostienen el rolcentral del Estado en la construcción del par inclusión/exclusión social.En el trabajo se reconstruye, primeramente, cómo un dispositivo estatal–originalmente pensado para varones– justifica la inclusión de chicas,generizando la situación de riesgo en la que ellas se encontrarían.Seguidamente, señala las consecuencias que dicho proceso tiene sobrela configuración de las feminidades juveniles. Los resultados indicanque la legitimación institucional de necesidades de las beneficiariascondiciona la configuración de feminidades y restringe aspectos dela experiencia juvenil y femenina. No obstante, dicho proceso norepresentaría, desde el punto de vista de las chicas, una contrariedad.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".