MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2499921010 · doi:10.35305/zf.v22i23.5

Articulaciones de edad y género en la construcción de feminidades en un programa de prevención del delito juvenil

2014· article· es· W2499921010 on OpenAlex
Marina Medan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueZona Franca · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American socio-political dynamics
Canadian institutionsPerformance Plants (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artículo analiza el interjuego existente entre las dimensionesde género y edad en la construcción de beneficiarias en un programade prevención del delito juvenil implementado en Buenos Aires. Elargumento se inscribe dentro de las discusiones que sostienen el rolcentral del Estado en la construcción del par inclusión/exclusión social.En el trabajo se reconstruye, primeramente, cómo un dispositivo estatal–originalmente pensado para varones– justifica la inclusión de chicas,generizando la situación de riesgo en la que ellas se encontrarían.Seguidamente, señala las consecuencias que dicho proceso tiene sobrela configuración de las feminidades juveniles. Los resultados indicanque la legitimación institucional de necesidades de las beneficiariascondiciona la configuración de feminidades y restringe aspectos dela experiencia juvenil y femenina. No obstante, dicho proceso norepresentaría, desde el punto de vista de las chicas, una contrariedad.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it