MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2499952102 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511497124.013

Coal, oil and security

2005· book-chapter· en· W2499952102 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert Millward

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2005
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoalEnergy securityCartelQuarter (Canadian coin)PetroleumFossil fuelNatural resource economicsNatural resourceResource (disambiguation)ElectricityNatural gasEconomyEnergy sourceEconomicsPolitical scienceEngineeringMarket economyWaste managementGeographyRenewable energyGeologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the third quarter of the twentieth century, oil replaced coal as the major source of energy in western Europe. During the last quarter, the growing power of the nations with oil reserves and the price increases introduced from the early 1970s by their cartel, the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), ensured that oil lost its predominance and mixed regimes of nuclear, HEP, oil, natural gas and coal emerged. Before the Second World War, coal was dominant, and the concentration of deposits in the UK, the Low Countries and Germany had vital effects on the energy policies of other European countries. I said little in earlier chapters about the structure of the coal industry and how it was regulated. As a natural resource, coal has certain similarities to oil, and in this chapter I attempt to explain how and why coal and oil were owned and regulated, to draw out the implications for the generation of electricity supply and to identify the key interests of the state. The economic organisation of the coal and oil sectors was very different from the other infrastructure industries. In brief, private enterprise has been dominant in much of the period since 1850, albeit with governments not far away. The need to control monopoly elements by price regulation and profit constraints was not strong.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooks→Same topicMarket Dynamics and Volatility→French-language works237,207→