Tupians and Turanians: hypotheses on the origins of man and civilization in the Americas in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo tem como ponto central o estudo das teorias a respeito da origem do homem americano e da antigüidade da civilização nas Américas, no contexto intelectual do século XIX e primeiras décadas do XX. Seu objetivo é mapear estas teorias no ambiente intelectual europeu e norte-americano para, em seguida, as vincular às discussões latino-americanas e brasileiras a respeito do grau de desenvolvimento, de civilização e de aperfeiçoamento das populações americanas originais (pré-conquista) e o papel da América na história do mundo civiüzado. Para atingir tais objetivos, o artigo analisa aspectos do desenvolvimento da filologia comparada, da etnologia e da antropologia para acompanhar a elaboração do monumento teórico-ideológico que foi denominado como de civilização indo-européia para, em seguida, buscar esclarecer o impacto destas discussões nas nascentes disciplinas da arqueologia e antropologia latino-americanas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".