Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peter Pan is regarded as being at the forefront of the Edwardian cult of childhood (White and Tarr 51), having 'initiated or played a larger part than any other work in initiating a fashion for "fairy" literature and illustration in the Edwardian nursery' (Carpenter 170), and Peter Pan does symbolize the youth and vitality of the age. Yet this essay will reveal the deep irony of this statement through exploring the ways in which James Matthew Barrie deconstructs or 'culls' childhood, challenging the conventional representation of children in the Edwardian era and undermining the sentimental construction of childhood promulgated in merchandise of the day. Although Barrie is often deemed to have created the epitome of childhood in Peter Pan, consideration will be made of ways in which Peter Pan can be regarded as a catalyst for change in the representation of childhood. The extent to which Peter Pan, therefore, 'force [s] us to challenge the most prevalent ideology of turn-of-the-century child-adult relations' will be explored (Coats 4).KeywordsBook TradeOriginal SinnerConsumer SocietyChild AudienceStage DirectionThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".