MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2500317367 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2016-1944

Abstract 1944: Integrated analysis of copy number and miRNA profiling in triple negative breast cancer of Latina women

2016· article· en· W2500317367 on OpenAlexaff
Bruna M. Sugita, Mandeep Gill, Silma Regina Ferreira Pereira, Yara R. Zabala, Aline Simoneti Fonseca, Selene E. Esposito, Cătălin Marian, Iglenir João Cavalli, Enilze MF Ribeiro, Yuriy Gusev, Luciane R. Cavalli

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMiRBaseTriple-negative breast cancermicroRNABreast cancerCopy-number variationCancer researchBiologyCancerOncologyMedicineComputational biologyBioinformaticsInternal medicineGeneGeneticsGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a clinically and molecularly heterogeneous disease, which incidence and outcome vary among the different ethnic and racial groups. These tumors are more commonly seen in younger women of African and Latinas/Hispanic descents, usually diagnosed at more advanced stages, with non-localized disease. Molecular studies have shown differences in the biology of these tumors in Latinas as key contributors for high mortality. The main objective of our study was to identify a miRNA signature associated with TNBC of Latina patients by integrating miRNA and array-CGH data. Archived paraffin samples of 32 TNBC and 25 non-TNBC cases from Latina patients, obtained from the Clinical Hospital (UFPR) in Brazil, were profiled for miRNA and array-CGH using the Nanostring and the Agilent SurePrint G3 Human array-CGH platforms, respectively. The miRNA and array-CGH data, obtained in the same samples, was directly integrated and combinatorial target predicted algorithms in conjunction with functional and pathway annotation enrichment systems were performed to identify the most relevant miRNAs and their corresponding gene targets. Eight-nine miRNAs were observed differentially expressed between the TNBC and non-TNBC lesions. Using miRBase and MiRDB target prediction databases 3,378 miRNAs targets were identified. After integration with array-CGH, a number of 15 miRNAs presented concomitant DNA copy number and miRNA alterations, reducing the number of targets to 1,242. Ingenuity pathway analysis identified the most affected canonical pathways, including IL-8, TGF-beta, PI3K-AKT and HER2 signaling pathways. Using our integration approach we were able to identify a robust miRNA signature associated with TNBC of Latina patients and to identify the potential molecular mechanism (s) that underline the observed miRNA deregulation in these patients. This signature revealed miRNAs and corresponding targets biologically relevant, involved in critical cancer signaling pathways and gene networks. Once this signature is functionally validated, its direct role in the aggressive clinical phenotype of these tumors will be determined. In summary, the findings of our study contributes to the identification of race/ethnic specific molecular targets that can set the basis for new TNBC treatments and for the future design of the most appropriate clinical trials and cancer control interventions for Latina women. Funding:This project was supported by the Georgetown University Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (CERSI; U01FD004319), a collaborative effort between the university and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to promote regulatory science through innovative research and education. This research does not necessarily reflect the views of the FDA. Citation Format: Bruna M. Sugita, Mandeep Gill, Silma R. Pereira, Yara R. Zabala, Aline S. Fonseca, Selene E. Esposito, Catalin Marian, Iglenir J. Cavalli, Enilze MF Ribeiro, Yuriy Gusev, Luciane R. Cavalli. Integrated analysis of copy number and miRNA profiling in triple negative breast cancer of Latina women. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 1944.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicMicroRNA in disease regulation→French-language works237,207→