MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2500467533 · doi:10.54846/jshap/373

Suspected gossypol toxicosis in a sow herd

2003· article· en· W2500467533 on OpenAlexaff
Suzanne Burlatschenko

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Swine Health and Production · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicResearch in Cotton Cultivation
Canadian institutionsEricsson (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGossypolHerdAnimal scienceMedicineVeterinary medicineBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 550-sow farrow-to-finish herd reported an increased incidence of sudden death in sows. Results of gross necropsy indicated severe ascites, hepatomegaly, cardiomegaly, and pulmonary edema, suggesting heart failure. This diagnosis was supported by a finding of hyperkalemia in nine of 14 sows blood sampled. Cottonseeds observed in the feed contained gossypol, a compound known to be cardiotoxic, at concentrations of 62 to 83 mg per kg. The diet was replaced and evidence of toxicosis abated over the subsequent 3 months.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Swine Health and ProductionSame topicResearch in Cotton CultivationFrench-language works237,207