La construction des domaines temporel et spirituel dans la poésie de Louis Riel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On a beaucoup étudié Louis Riel en tant qu’homme politique, mais encore peu en tant qu’homme de lettres. En fait, ce n’est que depuis la parution en 1985 du volume 4 des Écrits complets de Louis Riel, sous la direction de Glen Campbell, que les chercheurs ont accès à l’ensemble de l’œuvre poétique du fondateur du Manitoba. L’intérêt d’étudier les écrits poétiques de Riel réside surtout dans le caractère unique d’un univers poétique où coexistent et s’affrontent un domaine temporel et un domaine spirituel. Le premier s’inspire de la dure réalité vécue par le peuple métis ainsi que des problèmes personnels de Louis Riel. Le domaine spirituel, quant à lui, se construit à partir des traditions catholiques. Ainsi, le poète travaille à donner un caractère légitime à sa vocation de prophète en s’appropriant certaines des caractéristiques de la prêtrise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".