MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2500833638 · doi:10.1002/9781119224372.ch05

Leadership Is an Obligation—Step Up

2015· other· en· W2500833638 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCognitive Science and Education Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObligationCeremonyMeaning (existential)HumilityLawPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophyEpistemologyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1925, a group of Canadian engineers established a ceremony called the Ritual of the Calling of an Engineer, also called as the Iron Ring Ceremony. This ceremony instils early on the ideas of humility, obligation, and deliberateness. At the core of the ceremony-and the meaning behind the symbolic iron ring-is the idea that engineers must be humble. There are five core obligations that all leaders must understand, internalize, and live up to: obligation to oneself, obligation to one's customers, obligation to one's organization, obligation to one's employees, and obligation to one's communities. If a person is truly aware of what his/her obligations as a leader are and never loses sight of them while leading, he/she will be better able to manage the inherent tensions that will arise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.010
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.570
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.118 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCognitive Science and Education ResearchFrench-language works237,207