MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2500833638 · doi:10.1002/9781119224372.ch05

Leadership Is an Obligation—Step Up

2015· other· en· W2500833638 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCognitive Science and Education Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObligationCeremonyMeaning (existential)HumilityLawPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophyEpistemologyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1925, a group of Canadian engineers established a ceremony called the Ritual of the Calling of an Engineer, also called as the Iron Ring Ceremony. This ceremony instils early on the ideas of humility, obligation, and deliberateness. At the core of the ceremony-and the meaning behind the symbolic iron ring-is the idea that engineers must be humble. There are five core obligations that all leaders must understand, internalize, and live up to: obligation to oneself, obligation to one's customers, obligation to one's organization, obligation to one's employees, and obligation to one's communities. If a person is truly aware of what his/her obligations as a leader are and never loses sight of them while leading, he/she will be better able to manage the inherent tensions that will arise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0580.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.570
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.118 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCognitive Science and Education ResearchFrench-language works237,207