MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2501118385 · doi:10.1142/9789812791139_0006

STATISTICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE NORTHERN HEMISPHERE SEA ICE AND ATMOSPHERIC CIRCULATION DURING WINTERTIME

2004· book-chapter· en· W2501118385 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fang Zhi-fang

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Scientific series on Asia-Pacific weather and climate · 2004
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimatologyAtmospheric circulationNorthern HemisphereCirculation (fluid dynamics)OceanographyGeologyAtmospheric sciencesEnvironmental scienceGeographyMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The wintertime relationship between the Northern Hemisphere sea-ice concentration, 500-hPa height, sea level pressure and 1000-500-hPa thickness is examined. The Northern Hemispheric sea ice extent exhibits a strong sensitivity to the climatic variation of atmospheric circulation anomalies. The sea-ice extent has reduced in the Barents Sea, Greenland Sea and Labrador Sea since 1990. Particularly, the reduction of sea ice extent in the Barents Sea and Greenland Sea became evident as early as 1968. The Northern Hemispheric sea ice extent also exhibits a strong signal of decadal variability except the Greenland Sea where the downward trend is more pronounced. The sea ice variability is characterized by a dipole pattern in both the Atlantic and Pacific sectors. Its temporal variability is strongly coupled to the North Atlantic Oscillation (North Pacific Oscillation) in the Atlantic (Pacific) sector. The relationship is strongest when the atmosphere leads the sea ice by 1-2 weeks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Scientific series on Asia-Pacific weather and climateSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207