MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2501374292

IP Frame Switching: A Third-Generation SONET Technology

2005· article· en· W2501374292 on OpenAlexaff
Tim Ducharme, D.J. Shpak, Nick Tzonev, Thomas E. Darcie, Eric G. Manning, Ali Shoja

Bibliographic record

VenueOptical Fiber Communication Conference · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynchronous optical networkingComputer networkEthernet over SDHComputer scienceOptical mesh networkProvisioningTelecommunicationsWireless mesh networkEthernet
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Driven by the need to expand service offerings without significant CAPEX, enthusiasm for next-generation SONET (NG-SONET) technologies continues to build throughout the cable and telecom industries. NG-SONET allows carriers to extend the capabilities and service lifetime of the existing trillion-dollar global SONET/SDH infrastructure. Although NG-SONET is a general term used to describe enhanced SONET/SDH services, it is most often used to refer to the combined use of Generic Framing Procedure (GFP), Virtual Concatenation (VCAT), and Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme (LCAS). GFP provides a standardized capability for carrying multiple types of traffic, VCAT improves bandwidth utilization by providing finer granularity during provisioning, and LCAS is used to dynamically change the capacity of an established link.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptical Fiber Communication ConferenceSame topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207