MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2501383000 · doi:10.1057/9781403978592_3

Philosophy’s Hidden Revolt against God

2005· book-chapter· en· W2501383000 on OpenAlexaff
Shadia B. Drury

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooks · 2005
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSeventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoralityObedienceRevelationPhilosophyAsidePhilosophy of religionIslamMorality and religionEpistemologyReligious studiesLawTheologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The conflict between philosophy and society has its origin in the fact that philosophy cannot rationally justify the two things on which society rests: morality and religion. For Strauss these two are not separate. Morality has its source in law, and the latter cannot elicit the respect and obedience of the many if it is not believed to have divine origin. Strauss follows the Judaic and Islamic tradition in conceiving of religion in terms of Sacred Law. In this chapter I will set aside the question of morality and focus on what Strauss believes to be at issue between philosophy and religion, reason and revelation, or as he likes to say, Athens and Jerusalem. 1 These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.026
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooksSame topicSeventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical ThoughtFrench-language works237,207