MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2501421141 · doi:10.1057/9780230618541_2

Reinventing Poland as German Colonial Territory in the Nineteenth Century: Gustav Freytag’s Soll und Haben as Colonial Novel

2009· book-chapter· en· W2501421141 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooks · 2009
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman Colonialism and Identity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonialismDominionFrontierGermanDeclarationPower (physics)HistoryNarrativeArt historyArtAncient historyArchaeologyLiteratureLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The protagonist speaking these lines stands before a freshly plowed field with his arms outstretched as if to encompass the entire expanse of the surrounding landscape under the dominion of his heroic declaration. With this performance of the “colonial conqueror,” the protagonist is positioned within a tradition familiar to readers from the popular narratives of Spanish Conquistadors in South America, of the great surveying expeditions of the North American frontier, or of Victorian cartographers charting the interior of the African “dark continent.” Labeled by Mary Louise Pratt as “The Monarch of All I Survey,” this person identifies his power to see and visually organize a landscape with a legitimate, divine right to ownership and control.2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it