MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2501426348 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22611

Engineering safety into the design

2016· article· en· W2501426348 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Peter Scantlebury

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsAmec Foster Wheeler (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEngineering design processRisk analysis (engineering)Process (computing)Design processReliability engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringConstruction engineeringOperations managementBusinessWork in processMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Safety by design is Amec Foster Wheeler's systematic approach to engineering safety into the design. It is a five‐step approach to engineering design which results in the ability to demonstrate that hazards to people, the environment, assets, and reputation have been systematically and comprehensively identified, and eliminated or controlled during the design phase of the facility/system or equipment. As a result of the safety by design process, the overall risks of a design are minimized by eliminating hazards or applying the right hazards controls to minimize the right hazards. Furthermore, the design elements to control or eliminate the hazards are identified and designed early in the design process when the implementation cost is at a minimum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.010
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicOccupational Health and Safety ResearchFrench-language works237,207