MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2501439666 · doi:10.37099/mtu.dc.etdr/82

COHERENCE AND CHIMNEYCUBE INTERPRETATION OF PENOBSCOT AREA OFFSHORE NOVA SCOTIA

2016· dissertation· en· W2501439666 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cagri Ekinci

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaGeologySubmarine pipelineCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Structural basinHydrocarbon explorationDrillingSeismologyReflection (computer programming)Fossil fuelPetrologyPetroleum engineeringGeomorphologyPaleontologyOceanographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Faulted and fractured strata are very important features of potential hydrocarbon reservoir areas. Sometimes the faults form traps for the accumulation and concentration of hydrocarbon fluids, and sometimes faults and/or fractures create an escape route for the hydrocarbons from reservoirs. They, therefore, play a significant role especially in controlling the migration of oil and gas in both horizontal and vertical directions. When the predominant migrating hydrocarbon is gas, it becomes more important due to potential drilling hazards. In this study, I concentrate on the chaotic reflection patterns directly beneath major faults and on the footwall sides of those faults. The main interest is the cause of these time distortions of reflecting horizons, compared to deeper reflectors that have not been distorted, using data from the Penobscot area of Scotian Basin, on the shelf of Nova Scotia, Canada. First, I applied the coherence attribute with and without full dip-steered data to the 3D Penobscot data set. Two major faults and two minor faults were identified, and some anomalies were identified on the north sides (footwalls) of the faults. Second, I created a chimney cube in an attempt to image hydrocarbon migration in the area. The resulting images suggest that along the major two faults there is natural gas leakage that is creating gas clouds in shallower layers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.362
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques→French-language works237,207→