MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2501550405 · doi:10.1109/acc.2016.7526812

Automotive coldstart emissions reduction using MIMO sliding mode control with actuator saturation

2016· article· en· W2501550405 on OpenAlexafffund
Ahmad Mozaffari, Alireza Doosthoseini, Bijan Sakhdari, Mahyar Vajedi, Nasser L. Azad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMIMOControl theory (sociology)Sliding mode controlActuatorComputer scienceAutomotive industryController (irrigation)Context (archaeology)Reduction (mathematics)Automotive engineeringControl (management)EngineeringMathematicsPhysicsChannel (broadcasting)Aerospace engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, a modified version of multi-input multi-output (MIMO) sliding mode control technique is applied to reduce the total hydrocarbon emissions of an automotive engine during the coldstart period. This specific control design technique is suitable for MIMO systems with constraints on their input signals and it allows finding a set of upper limits for the gains of sliding mode controller (SMC) with regard to the given input constraints. In this context, an optimization problem is formulated to calculate the upper bounds of SMC gains to ensure the feasibility of the calculated control commands for the considered coldstart control problem. Through simulations, it is indicated that the devised SMC can properly track the given exhaust gas temperature (T <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">exh</sub> ) and engine-out hydrocarbon emission (HC <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">raw-c</sub> ) desired profiles in the presence of external disturbances without violating the existing engine system input constraints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207