MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2501615683

Preparing our Educators for Interprofessional Learning: A Framework for a Work-based Interprofessional Learning Staff Development Workshop

2007· article· en· W2501615683 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gillian Nisbet, Jill Thistlethwaite

Bibliographic record

VenueFocus on Health Professional Education A Multi-Professional Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTeamworkHealth careInterprofessional educationMedical educationCurriculumWork (physics)NursingService-learningMedicinePsychologyPedagogyEngineeringPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the increasing complexity of health care there is a recognition that to provide safe, effective, and efficient care an Interprofessional collaborative team approach is required (Canada Health 2004; Institute of Medicine 2003). Given this focus on teamwork, there is strong international interest to incorporate interprofessional learning (IPL) into the curriculum of health care university programs to better prepare students for future practice, with the ultimate aim of enhancing the quality of service delivery and improving patient/ client care outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.421
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.511
Teacher spread0.448 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFocus on Health Professional Education A Multi-Professional JournalSame topicInterprofessional Education and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207