MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2502010969 · doi:10.1385/0-89603-510-7:1

Quantitative Autoradiography of Monoamine Uptake Sites and Receptors in Rat and Mouse Brain

2003· book-chapter· en· W2502010969 on OpenAlexaff
Tomás A. Reader, C. Strazielle

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2003
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReceptorMonoamine neurotransmitterCentral nervous systemDistribution (mathematics)BiologyNeuroscienceCell biologyPharmacologyChemistryBiochemistrySerotonin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the last twenty years, the availabihty of radioactively labeled compounds that bind with high affinity and selectivity to pharmacological receptors has enabled the direct measurement of such binding sites. After initial studies, carried out with tissue homogenates, membrane preparations, or synaptosomal preparations, it became obvious that the distribution of many of these receptors was not homogenous within the brain, and more refined methods were developed to establish their distribution in the central nervous system (CNS). One early improvement implemented for receptor topology studies was to carry out homogenate binding assays with small samples microdissected from discrete brain regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207