MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2502254233 · doi:10.1109/itec.2016.7520261

Optimal energy/time routing in battery-powered vehicles

2016· article· en· W2502254233 on OpenAlexaff
Mahmoud Faraj, Otman Basir

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattery (electricity)Computer scienceRange (aeronautics)Routing (electronic design automation)Mode (computer interface)Energy consumptionEnergy (signal processing)Battery capacityDriving rangeWork (physics)Path (computing)Vehicle routing problemMathematical optimizationAutomotive engineeringSimulationEngineeringElectrical engineeringComputer networkPower (physics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The limited battery capacity of Electric vehicles (EVs), and consequently limited cruising range, hinders their widespread adoption. This paper proposes a solution to the problem of optimal energy/time routing under battery constraints. A multi-criteria path-finding algorithm, A*, is proposed to function in two modes. The first is an energy mode to solve the problem of energy-optimal routing under battery constraints. This mode computes the most energy-efficient route from a source to a destination, thus extending the cruising range of the battery. The second is a travel-time mode to compute the time-optimal route under the battery constraints. The multi-criteria model aims to use the modes to strike a balance between energy consumption and travel time, so as to satisfy the user constraints and needs. This research reports simulation work conducted to test and validate the proposed model under various driving conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207