MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2502631349 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316217283.004

SPECTACLE AND MEMORY: THE REIGN OF TRAJAN, <i>OPTIMUS PRINCEPS</i> (A.D. 98–117)

2016· book-chapter· en· W2502631349 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maggie L. Popkin

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Religious Studies of Rome
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmperorReignSpectacleGloryArtQuarter (Canadian coin)Ancient historyPopulationHistoryArchaeologyLawPolitical sciencePoliticsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION Rome reached its apogee of wealth, stability, and geographic expanse under the emperor Trajan. Although Trajan led spectacularly successful military campaigns in Dacia, which flooded Rome's coffers with gold, and celebrated two magnificent Dacian triumphs, he is seldom considered in conjunction with the triumphal route. Yet Trajan oversaw the monumentalization of the viewing spot par excellence for triumphs: the Circus Maximus, which could accommodate more spectators for triumphal processions than all Rome's other spectator buildings combined. Trajan enlarged the Circus Maximus and transformed it from a mostly wooden structure to a colossal, marble arena that could house nearly a quarter of Rome's entire population. His Circus Maximus not only provided an enormous venue for viewing triumphs but also eternalized that venue in permanent, lavish materials that evoked Rome's glory even when triumphs and other spectacles were not occurring inside it. This chapter argues that Trajan's Circus Maximus was designed to generate intense sensations of collectivity amongst Romans viewing his Dacian triumphs and thus to make triumphs more memorable. It exemplifies a trend toward constructing permanent spectator buildings along the triumphal route, including the Theater of Marcellus and, perhaps, the Colosseum, as a means to intensify the experience and memorableness of triumphs under the empire, when they became much more rare as the ritual was restricted to the imperial family. The culmination of this trend is Trajan's Circus Maximus, a fitting home for the urban population of Rome that encouraged Romans to see their city as the center of the world. The chapter begins by tracing the transformations the triumph underwent in the imperial period. The restriction of the triumph to the imperial family made the ritual occur much more rarely, which increased emperors’ desire for triumphs to pass through permanent spectator buildings that could make them more memorable. It also outlines imperial building projects along the triumphal route prior to Trajan to contextualize Trajan's significant but often underappreciated contributions to the route. It then describes Trajan's building projects along the route, focusing particularly on his spectacular Circus Maximus, before turning to the effects of this colossal structure on how Romans experienced and remembered triumphs under the empire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicHistorical and Religious Studies of RomeFrench-language works237,207