MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2502755217

High precision measurements of 26Na β- decay

2004· article· en· W2502755217 on OpenAlexfundno aff
G. F. Grinyer, C. E. Svensson, C. Andreoiu, A. Andreyev, R. A. E. Austin, G. C. Ball, R. S. Chakrawarthy, P. Finlay, P. E. Garrett, G. Hackman, J. C. Hardy, B. Hyland, V. E. Iacob, K. A. Koopmans, W.D. Kulp, J. R. Leslie, J. A. Macdonald, A. C. Morton, W. E. Ormand, C. J. Osborne, C. J. Pearson, A. A. Phillips, F. Sarazin, M. A. Schumaker, H. C. Scraggs, J. von Schwarzenberg, M. B. Smith, J. J. Valiente-Dobón, J. C. Waddington, J.L. Wood, E. F. Zganjar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryTRIUMFMcMaster University
KeywordsPhysicsNuclear physicsParticle physics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High precision measurements of the half-life and, [beta]-branching ratios from the [beta]-decay of 26Na to 26Mg have been performed with the intention of establishing the half-life to better than ±0.05%. The half-life was measured from the [beta] activity with a 4[pi] proportional counter and fast tape transport system while the [beta]-branching ratios were determined from the [gamma] activity using the 8[pi] [gamma]-ray spectrometer, both located at the ISAC facility at TRIUMF. In order to determine the half-life to the required precision, careful scrutiny of all possible sources of systematic uncertainty was essential. A general computer program was created from first principles to fit dead-time affected, Poisson distributed data, valid for all numbers of counts per bin. In addition to the half-life, the [beta]-branching ratios and 'ft' values for this decay are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207